LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for BIBLIST Archives


BIBLIST Archives

BIBLIST Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave BIBLIST
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject:

Re: Institutionella arkiv en stagnerande verksamhet

From:

Anders Ericson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

BIBLIST - Topics in Nordic research library user services <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:09:51 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)


Hmm... det fins kanskje motstridende tendenser. Det må vi undersöke.

Kanskje dette jeg refererte til for kort tid siden, var for
optimistisk (må innrömme at jeg tenkte tanken)
http://seogsaa.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/akademisk-publisering-bryter-sammen/

Anders Ericson

Den 16:26 2. april 2012 skrev Jan Szczepanski
<[log in to unmask]> følgende:
> Trots hot och tvångsåtgärder och miljonsatsningar tycks inte
> institutionella arkiv i någon större
> utsträckning fyllas med material, åtminstone inte i Nederländerna
> enligt en färsk utredning.
> I Sverige har man betraktat den holländska utvecklingen som en lyckad
> förebild. Sannolikt
> ser vi samma nedslående resultat och stagnation i Sverige.
>
> Länk till den engelska sammanfattningen
> http://www.surf.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Monitor2011_strategicsynopsis_ENGdef.pdf
>
> Klipp:
>
> Key observations as regards Open Access
> • The percentage of publications made available annually via the
> repositories on an Open Access (OA) basis (referred to below as
> “coverage”) has not increased significantly since 2007; in 2010, it
> fluctuated between 7% and 30% at virtually all institutions.
> • It is only in the case of theses that a large majority of the
> universities have succeeded in achieving coverage of more than 80%
> over the past four years (2007–2010).
> • The level of OA success (i.e. as regards theses) or stagnation (as
> regards all other publications) does not correlate with university
> mandates or personnel capacity.
> • Implementation of six of the nine “standard” success factors for
> institutional repositories at more than half the institutions has not
> led to a higher level of coverage. Based on experience so far with the
> three other success factors, no breakthroughs can be expected here
> either.
>
> Den ensidiga satsningen på institutionella arkiv har kanske tilltalat
> administrationen på dom olika
> institutionerna men det har varit till men för Open Access. Den
> självklara satsningen som borde
> ha inletts för många år sedan nämligen att uppmuntra skapandet av fria
> e-tidskrifter har helt försummats.
>
> Ett visst intresse tycks finnas hos Styrgruppen för OpenAccess.se i
> dom senaste minnesanteckningarna
> http://www.kb.se/dokument/Om/projekt/open_access/2012/Styrgruppsminne%20OA%20120322%20final.pdf
>
> Jan
>
> --
> Jan Szczepański
> F.d Förste bibliotekare och chef för f.d Avdelningen
> för humaniora vid Göteborgs universitetsbibliotek
> E-post: [log in to unmask]
>



--
Hilsen
Anders Ericson


Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main BIBLIST Page

Permalink



SEGATE.SUNET.SE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager