LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for BIBLIST Archives


BIBLIST Archives

BIBLIST Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave BIBLIST
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Sex rapporter om open access
From: Jan Szczepanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:BIBLIST - Topics in Nordic research library user services <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:34:22 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (379 lines)


Kanske av intresse för fler

Jan


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Éric Archambault <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2014-10-23 16:04 GMT+02:00
Subject: [GOAL]  Open Access Week: Series of reports on OA
To: "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)" <[log in to unmask]>


Apologies for cross-posting



As part of Open Access Week 2014, a series of six reports on open
access, produced for the European Commission (EC), were posted
yesterday on the Science-Metrix website:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports



These reports were produced as part of the EC efforts to monitor the
development of open access (OA) availability of peer-reviewed papers
in addition to examining policies to promote OA data and scientific
publications.



The core report in the series provides definitions for OA scientific
papers to address some of the shortcomings of existing definitions
which are far too incomplete to grasp the full spectrum of situations
encountered while measuring OA availability.



The following definitions are suggested:



A: Access—can be open (free), restricted or paid; with unrestricted or
restricted usage rights; quality controlled or not; pre-print
(pre-referring), post-print (post-referring), or published version
(with final copy editing and page layout); immediate or delayed;
permanent or transient.



OA: Open Access—freely available online to all.



IOA: Ideal OA—free; quality controlled (peer-reviewed or editorially
controlled); with unrestricted usage rights (e.g. CC BY); in final,
published form; immediate; permanent.



RA: Restricted Access—access restricted to members of a group, club, or society.



PA: Paid Access—access restricted by a pay wall; includes subscription
access, licensed access, and pay-to-view access.



Restricted OA—free but with download restrictions (e.g. registration
required, restricted to manual download, HTML-only as opposed to
self-contained format such as PDF) or re-use rights (e.g. CC NC).



Green OA—OA provided before or immediately after publication by author
self-archiving.



Gold OA—immediate OA provided by a publisher, sometimes with paid for
publication fee. Note that several Gold journals have right
restriction: they are Gold ROA. For example, of the 38% of journals
listed in the DOAJ that use a Creative Common licence, only 53% use
the CC-BY licence that would allow them to qualify for the IOA
definition above (Herb, 2014).

Gold OA Journal—journal offering immediate cover-to-cover access.

Gold OA Article—immediately accessible paper appearing in a Gold
journal, or in a PA journal (the latter is also sometimes referred to
as hybrid open access).



ROA: Robin Hood OA or Rogue OA—Available for free in spite of
restrictions, usage rights, or copyrights (overriding RA, PA,
Restricted OA). As the publishers' copyright policies and
self-archiving rules are compiled by the University of Nottingham in
the SHERPA/RoMEO database, Rogue OA is synonymous with Robin Hood OA.



DOA: Delayed OA—access after a delay period or embargo.

Delayed Green OA—free online access provided by the author after a
delay (due to author's own delay to make available for free) or
embargo period (typically imposed by publisher).

Delayed Gold OA—free online access provided by the publisher after a
delay (e.g. change of policy that makes contents available for free)
or embargo period.

Delayed Gold OA Journal—Journal offering cover-to-cover access after
an embargo period or after a delay.

Delayed Gold OA Article—Paper appearing in a Gold journal or in a PA
journal (the latter is also sometimes referred to as hybrid open
access) which is available after an embargo period or after a delay.



TOA: Transient OA—free online access during a certain time.

Transient Green OA—free online access provided by the author for a
certain time which then disappears. Note that a substantial part of
Green OA could be Transient Green OA due to the unstable nature of the
internet, websites, and institutional repositories, many of which are
not updated or maintained after a period of time and are therefore
susceptible to deletion in subsequent institutional website overhauls.
There are also integrator repositories that can change access rules,
for example after being acquired by a third party.

Transient Gold OA—free but temporary online access provided by the
publisher, instead of permanent. Sometimes appears as part of
promotion. Note that some Gold journals and articles sometimes become
paid access after a certain time, because of revised strategies by a
publisher or because they are sold to another publisher who instaures
paid access.



Looking forward, we need to understand these various forms of OA
availability. It was beyond the scope of this project to measure all
these forms but it is an essential element to address. For example,
Robin Hood OA has hardly been measured and is somewhat of a taboo
subject. Transiency is another ill-understood subject that should be
addressed by fundamental questions such as; What is the percentage of
OA papers which are transient and why is this occurring?



Relative to these definitions, the report has shortcomings. In the
present reports, the following operational definitions were used to
perform measurement:



Green OA: refers to papers which are self-archived by authors and
available on institutional repositories as listed in OpenDOAR and/or
in ROAR. Listings in OpenDOAR and ROAR which correspond to known Gold
OA Journals were set aside. Aggregator sites such as CiteSeerX were
not considered here, since, even though they access article
submissions, they do not constitute a repository in the classical
sense. Likewise, articles in the main PubMed Central sites were not
counted as Green as they have curtailed usage rights or limited
download rights.[3] Because it is commonly difficult to determine
whether a paper was self-archived before, at the same time or after
publication and also how long it will be available on the internet,
Green OA includes Green OA, Delayed Green and Transient Green. Note
that some of these articles may not respect restrictions placed by
journal publishers (many of whose rules can be found on
SHERPA/ROMEO)[4] and therefore contain a certain number of Robin Hood
OA papers. Finally, only articles which could be downloaded without
user registrations were considered.



Gold Journals OA: refers to papers appearing in journals listed in the
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)[5] and on the PubMed Central
list of journals.[6] When a paper is published during the first year
that a journal appears in the DOAJ, it is not counted. This is a
conservative decision due to the fact that one cannot determine
whether a journal started publishing Gold articles early or late
during the year. For PubMed Central, only open access journals with
full participation and immediate access were considered to be Gold,
hence all journals with an embargo and in the 'NIH Portfolio' were not
considered. Thus, this category covers articles appearing in Gold
journals and excludes delayed Gold as well as piecemeal Gold (Gold
articles in paid access journals, also called hybrid OA).



Other OA: refers to pretty much everything that could be found on the
web by a determined researcher and downloaded for free and which was
not part of the Green and Gold operational definitions above. This
comprises articles appearing in journals with an embargo period
(Delayed Gold OA); articles appearing on authors' webpages and
elsewhere (both Green OA and Rogue OA); articles appearing on
aggregator sites such as ResearchGate and CiteSeerX in addition to
PubMed Central. The category comprises both transiently and
permanently accessible items as there are no reliable ways to
ascertain at measurement time whether an item will be permanently
accessible or not.



Total OA: The mutually exclusive sum of Green OA, Gold Journal OA, and Other OA.



These definitions, though they made sense from an operational
point-of-view, are inadequate for the future. They were used in
response to comments received on last year’s series of reports. They
were a stopgap measure and reflected what could be done on the
project’s budget and with the tools available. More detailed work is
required, preferably on a large scale such as was done in this study
(sample larger than 1 million randomly selected articles).



An important aspect of the study which we hope will be followed by
other metrology undertakings on OA availability is the use of: 1)
large scale measurement to reduce statistical error; 2) use of
calibration sample to determine adjustment by counting precisely
recall and precision of the large scale measurement apparatus; 3)
applying the calibration to the measured quantities. With hindsight,
the application of the second part of the technique is a weak point of
the study as the sample size was too small (500) and added an error of
± 4.5 percentage points. The manual calibration should be closer to
10,000 randomly selected papers to establish a gold standard to reduce
additional error to about 1 percentage point (simplified discussion
here, please see report D1.8 for a more elaborate discussion).



Discussion of the source of data’s characteristics is also essential.
We need to have a more in-depth understanding of OA availability per
country. I strongly suspect that countries that are not covered by WoS
and Scopus are more likely to have a greater propensity to diffuse
knowledge openly (and more so for the former, which partly explains
why measuring OA with WoS provides lower scores). Combining WoS with
no calibration for recall and precision can lead to a very serious
underestimation of OA availability (missing more than 40% of the
actual count of all peer-reviewed papers). It is likely that this
study also underestimates OA availability because of the inadequate
non-English language scientific literature in Scopus.



Another important contribution of the report is the examination of the
scientific impact of OA vs. non-OA literature with three scores: 1)
normalised impact of all literature (=1.0); 2) normalised impact of OA
literature; 3) normalised impact of non-OA literature. Using a
one-million article sample shows the deleterious effect, on average,
of non-espousing an OA diffusion strategy. Data are also presented on
broad fields of knowledge and show that green OA is king for impact
yet even the younger (on average) gold journals are showing greater
impact than the more-established (on average) subscription-based
journals in several fields. Seriously designed studies are required to
control for embargo to understand how DOA papers are disadvantaged in
terms of scientific impact relative to immediate OA.



These results are presented at length in the report which can be
downloaded from here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/proportion-of-open-access-papers-published-in-peer-reviewed-journals-at-the



A review of OA policies for scientific publication can be found here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/state-of-art-analysis-of-oa-strategies-to-peer-review-publications



A review of OA policies for scientific data can be found here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/state-of-art-analysis-of-oa-strategies-to-scientific-data



A comparative analysis of OA policies for scientific publications and
data can be found here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/comparative-analysis-of-the-strengths-and-weaknesses-of-existing-open-access



A synthesis report on OA availability and policies can be found here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/evolution-of-open-access-policies-and-availability-1996-2013-0



Finally, the short version of this synthesis can be found here:



http://science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports#/en/publications/reports/summary-report-evolution-of-open-access-policies-and-availability-1996-2013



Have a great Open Access Week and we hope you will appreciate these
weekend readings.



Yours sincerely



Eric Archambault, Ph.D.

President and CEO | Président-directeur général

Science-Metrix

Brussels | Montréal | Washington

1335, Mont-Royal E

Montréal, QC  H2J 1Y6

Canada



T. 1.514.495.6505 x.111

F. 1.514.495.6523

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Web:    www.science-metrix.com




________________________________

[3] The PubMed Central site mentions 'You may NOT use any kind of
automated process to download articles in bulk from the main PMC site.
PMC will block the access of any user who is found to be violating
this policy'. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/faq/#q12.

[4] http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/.

[5] https://doaj.org/about.

[6] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/.


_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal



-- 
Jan Szczepański
F.d Förste bibliotekarie och chef för f.d Avdelningen för humaniora,
vid f.d. Centralbiblioteket, Göteborgs universitetsbibliotek
E-post: [log in to unmask]

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main BIBLIST Page

Permalink



SEGATE.SUNET.SE

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager